Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-22 00:16:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F77CBE8DD06C0174809AC88015D5F3120C5A624833D9EFF4D75442C6F58AB479
Participant Details

Original Note:

Lo studio che apparentemente viene citato da questo articolo giunge a conclusioni opposte riguardo all’affidabilità dei vaccini COVID (come anche sostiene qui su X uno degli autori Anders Hviid) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24001270

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1760309781707771968
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F77CBE8DD06C0174809AC88015D5F3120C5A624833D9EFF4D75442C6F58AB479
  • createdAtMillis - 1708560976237
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1760309781707771968F77CBE8DD06C0174809AC88015D5F3120C5A624833D9EFF4D75442C6F58AB479