Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-22 06:44:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D551E30C4008E935B792AFF91BE6618B991F9DBE69CE93EB2F32C7069AEA08AD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Lo studio che apparentemente viene citato da questo articolo giunge a conclusioni opposte riguardo all’affidabilità dei vaccini COVID (come anche sostiene qui su X uno degli autori Anders Hviid) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24001270

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1760309781707771968
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D551E30C4008E935B792AFF91BE6618B991F9DBE69CE93EB2F32C7069AEA08AD
  • createdAtMillis - 1708584282527
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1760309781707771968D551E30C4008E935B792AFF91BE6618B991F9DBE69CE93EB2F32C7069AEA08AD