Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-21 14:25:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 771CC540D376AA9D13A2BD88090965C61632C0232A09409FBBCEA476A0194F65
Participant Details

Original Note:

O tweet não precisa de nota. Em nenhum momento, foi mencionado que o público geral poderia ter acesso ao código-fonte. Na postagem, foi dito que, entre as entidades e os partidos autorizados, apenas 3 solicitaram o acesso. Para inserir informações adicionais, use os comentários.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1760272048465613280
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 771CC540D376AA9D13A2BD88090965C61632C0232A09409FBBCEA476A0194F65
  • createdAtMillis - 1708525504209
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1760272048465613280771CC540D376AA9D13A2BD88090965C61632C0232A09409FBBCEA476A0194F65