Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-26 00:21:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 550AC5285704F3DB8DB06F8EA77FA8F1F5CE74E83E1B90F4F54E4FE543144819
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die angeführten Arbeiten von Dagsvik und Moen wurden als fehlerhaft erkannt und zeugen von fehlendem Verständnis der Autoren für Physik und Modellierung des Klimas. https://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2023/11/a-distraction-due-to-errors-misunderstanding-and-misguided-norwegian-statistics/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1760000130680533361
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 550AC5285704F3DB8DB06F8EA77FA8F1F5CE74E83E1B90F4F54E4FE543144819
  • createdAtMillis - 1708906876973
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1760000130680533361550AC5285704F3DB8DB06F8EA77FA8F1F5CE74E83E1B90F4F54E4FE543144819