Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-20 15:50:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DBEFA9CC407D87B8B02B5DCF758CC106933D1B7D40FD1E81514C564E407DF09C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, the fact that the account has since been reinstated is not relevant. The question as to what rules were broken to necessitate a ban remains valid.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1759947041524830517
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DBEFA9CC407D87B8B02B5DCF758CC106933D1B7D40FD1E81514C564E407DF09C
  • createdAtMillis - 1708444239374
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1759947041524830517DBEFA9CC407D87B8B02B5DCF758CC106933D1B7D40FD1E81514C564E407DF09C