Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-20 18:11:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FDE78AD92305B11F5A43AC17FE87D93E4547C091176BC4051064FB38FA87597F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die Union hat mit der Klage nicht die Sinnhaftigkeit des Einsatzes von Haushaltsmittel für den Klimaschutz angegriffen, sondern die verfassungswidrige rückwirkende Umwidmung von Kreditermächtigungen unter Umgehung der Schuldenbremse. Quelle: https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Pressemitteilungen/DE/2023/bvg23-101.html;jsessionid=92BE004A22B59FD6CFD2A8941483B430.internet972

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1759916789436195072
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FDE78AD92305B11F5A43AC17FE87D93E4547C091176BC4051064FB38FA87597F
  • createdAtMillis - 1708452710607
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1759916789436195072FDE78AD92305B11F5A43AC17FE87D93E4547C091176BC4051064FB38FA87597F