Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-22 04:18:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9E161CDED8CB7EF9FEE8622B9D8C1C2690C5D5843270929CF0F5F853577DAE50
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no evidence to support that the jury using social media instead of evidence & facts in determining the verdict & no evidence given of posts made saying Amber Heard deserved being hit, which the jury denied via the verdict. Court documents & evidence & watch trial https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-cases https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLoW1SIeAWaWb1IDY_WuLKvZygiJudUBSd&si=ZWuF7erUWniZaVRM

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1759850908052070432
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9E161CDED8CB7EF9FEE8622B9D8C1C2690C5D5843270929CF0F5F853577DAE50
  • createdAtMillis - 1708575537210
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17598509080520704329E161CDED8CB7EF9FEE8622B9D8C1C2690C5D5843270929CF0F5F853577DAE50