Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-20 09:23:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A0A89372AF2862E2DECA029B8FF3FE7BB4C1ADD66168FB4BA37F32DBBF44D310
Participant Details

Original Note:

Kyseinen analyysi on vanhentunut ja tyrmätty asiantuntijoiden piireissä ja antaa asiasta väärän kuvan. https://www.hs.fi/politiikka/art-2000005532659.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1759833157103231211
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A0A89372AF2862E2DECA029B8FF3FE7BB4C1ADD66168FB4BA37F32DBBF44D310
  • createdAtMillis - 1708421038345
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1759833157103231211A0A89372AF2862E2DECA029B8FF3FE7BB4C1ADD66168FB4BA37F32DBBF44D310