Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-20 09:04:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C6487E988CC2E86AC12C09AC185769A0E5100D848C3A670C2F412ACFED8A4B78
Participant Details

Original Note:

The judgement does not say mandates (Government) were unjustified. It questions whether or not the applicants should have been dismissed by the NZDF (Employer), the judgement has been referred back to NZDF and no action is taken in the meantime. https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/judgments/court-of-appeal/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1759801198025310630
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C6487E988CC2E86AC12C09AC185769A0E5100D848C3A670C2F412ACFED8A4B78
  • createdAtMillis - 1708419884256
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1759801198025310630C6487E988CC2E86AC12C09AC185769A0E5100D848C3A670C2F412ACFED8A4B78