Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-07 08:22:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8089DA9DA671BACE9590F5D502642C5060FF39563757D96AF25E008B79DA2B32
Participant Details

Original Note:

The judgement does not say mandates (Government) were unjustified. It questions whether or not the applicants should have been dismissed by the NZDF (Employer), the judgement has been referred back to NZDF and no action is taken in the meantime. https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/judgments/court-of-appeal/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1759801198025310630
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8089DA9DA671BACE9590F5D502642C5060FF39563757D96AF25E008B79DA2B32
  • createdAtMillis - 1709799725915
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17598011980253106308089DA9DA671BACE9590F5D502642C5060FF39563757D96AF25E008B79DA2B32