Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-20 20:00:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4FA2DD5B10950444EAC84251B9A756B44D164341DA52D33B90737A1F1828F3BD
Participant Details

Original Note:

The judgement does not say mandates (Government) were unjustified. It questions whether or not the applicants should have been dismissed by the NZDF (Employer), the judgement has been referred back to NZDF and no action is taken in the meantime. https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/judgments/court-of-appeal/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1759801198025310630
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4FA2DD5B10950444EAC84251B9A756B44D164341DA52D33B90737A1F1828F3BD
  • createdAtMillis - 1708459208647
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17598011980253106304FA2DD5B10950444EAC84251B9A756B44D164341DA52D33B90737A1F1828F3BD