Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-20 09:19:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4EA9C8A2269FF173168628FA3D66F3DECB71DDF6AFFAE3E2BD980A9A04722C9E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The judgement does not say mandates (Government) were unjustified. It questions whether or not the applicants should have been dismissed by the NZDF (Employer), the judgement has been referred back to NZDF and no action is taken in the meantime. https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/judgments/court-of-appeal/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1759801198025310630
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4EA9C8A2269FF173168628FA3D66F3DECB71DDF6AFFAE3E2BD980A9A04722C9E
  • createdAtMillis - 1708420757976
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17598011980253106304EA9C8A2269FF173168628FA3D66F3DECB71DDF6AFFAE3E2BD980A9A04722C9E