Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-20 03:43:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F5846057A2B025424C1093105AF28E5E026F43128E9A5F5DB60710DA0A7E181F
Participant Details

Original Note:

La fiscal, en el contexto de la entrevista, dice que no hay pruebas contundentes para la revisiĆ³n de la sentencia en el caso Sobornos. https://twitter.com/politikcorrecta/status/1759247400697250074?t=vVuKT3HpZiVibZJX0eMv-A&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1759677352924037386
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F5846057A2B025424C1093105AF28E5E026F43128E9A5F5DB60710DA0A7E181F
  • createdAtMillis - 1708400635447
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1759677352924037386F5846057A2B025424C1093105AF28E5E026F43128E9A5F5DB60710DA0A7E181F