Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-19 20:18:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 62FAD119D232F952AC4FE8029614076390BA2D85773B7FE3F53D00419F09D318
Participant Details

Original Note:

No es nota de opinión es TRANSCRIPCION EXACTA de lo que dice una abogada públicamente,la señora expresa SU verdad sin guión y al parecer emite explicitemente un argumento jurídico de FALTA DE EVIDENCIAS en un caso que ella ganó en contra de un expresidente, en el caso Sobornos https://twitter.com/politikcorrecta/status/1759247400697250074?t=vVuKT3HpZiVibZJX0eMv-A&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1759654103112642795
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 62FAD119D232F952AC4FE8029614076390BA2D85773B7FE3F53D00419F09D318
  • createdAtMillis - 1708373918838
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175965410311264279562FAD119D232F952AC4FE8029614076390BA2D85773B7FE3F53D00419F09D318