Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-19 12:05:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D6BC9EBF2265E61ACD92BD9CFA3C511826C66723752EF40D103B25CA05C3BE00
Participant Details

Original Note:

L'articolo al suo interno specifica che i limiti sono stati superati anche secondo Copernicus e le Arpa territoriali. Di seguito Arpa Lombardia, nell'articolo ci sono i link agli altri dataset che confermano la situazione preoccupante anche escludendo il ranking int.le sospetto https://www.arpalombardia.it/temi-ambientali/aria/stime-modellistiche/dettaglio-comuni/?comune=451

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1759381378456547663
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D6BC9EBF2265E61ACD92BD9CFA3C511826C66723752EF40D103B25CA05C3BE00
  • createdAtMillis - 1708344354702
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1759381378456547663D6BC9EBF2265E61ACD92BD9CFA3C511826C66723752EF40D103B25CA05C3BE00