Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-21 10:19:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D0FB9191F71BE7DB8A831F54C00B50495E91ADA84463FBBDD723F5098199019F
Participant Details

Original Note:

A 'fact check' should be independent of Government and a post labelled as such from a Government Office should not be accepted as such. The letter is also undated. The Government have been found to fact check themselves before https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/nov/19/tories-tweet-anti-labour-posts-under-factcheckuk-brand

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1759326320444551401
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D0FB9191F71BE7DB8A831F54C00B50495E91ADA84463FBBDD723F5098199019F
  • createdAtMillis - 1708510787227
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1759326320444551401D0FB9191F71BE7DB8A831F54C00B50495E91ADA84463FBBDD723F5098199019F