Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-19 05:26:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F6D47A1D74CF8D152C6AB018DFC8E9C324EAC68783C170E7A0D3B07FCDBD23F6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Supreme Court unanimously established the principle that speech may not be restrained it "is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action." (Brandenburg v. Ohio) www.aclu.org/wp-content/uploads/legal-documents/4156_ri_1978.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1759288163351036129
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F6D47A1D74CF8D152C6AB018DFC8E9C324EAC68783C170E7A0D3B07FCDBD23F6
  • createdAtMillis - 1708320395249
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1759288163351036129F6D47A1D74CF8D152C6AB018DFC8E9C324EAC68783C170E7A0D3B07FCDBD23F6