Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-19 15:52:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D4F8335976161A18DA9624D6DC9C532961B816209501E1BB7DFBE7931C1AA1A7
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Supreme Court unanimously established the principle that speech may not be restrained it "is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action." (Brandenburg v. Ohio) www.aclu.org/wp-content/uploads/legal-documents/4156_ri_1978.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1759288163351036129
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D4F8335976161A18DA9624D6DC9C532961B816209501E1BB7DFBE7931C1AA1A7
  • createdAtMillis - 1708357938610
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1759288163351036129D4F8335976161A18DA9624D6DC9C532961B816209501E1BB7DFBE7931C1AA1A7