Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-19 21:58:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B2FFA37DAF4F6D4A8CC6E8C88931028B06070EF167C06F8BE46D1CF58ACF97A7
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Supreme Court unanimously established the principle that speech may not be restrained it "is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action." (Brandenburg v. Ohio) www.aclu.org/wp-content/uploads/legal-documents/4156_ri_1978.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1759288163351036129
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B2FFA37DAF4F6D4A8CC6E8C88931028B06070EF167C06F8BE46D1CF58ACF97A7
  • createdAtMillis - 1708379902036
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1759288163351036129B2FFA37DAF4F6D4A8CC6E8C88931028B06070EF167C06F8BE46D1CF58ACF97A7