Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-19 02:31:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A530E03131AC56F5F9F5CF1EABF021B861333BA3F3E1416CF5F2B02E816F7EAC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Supreme Court unanimously established the principle that speech may not be restrained it "is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action." (Brandenburg v. Ohio) www.aclu.org/wp-content/uploads/legal-documents/4156_ri_1978.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1759288163351036129
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A530E03131AC56F5F9F5CF1EABF021B861333BA3F3E1416CF5F2B02E816F7EAC
  • createdAtMillis - 1708309911716
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1759288163351036129A530E03131AC56F5F9F5CF1EABF021B861333BA3F3E1416CF5F2B02E816F7EAC