Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-18 08:49:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D9E059D57950D3F2212D8748B3BFD5B5EC8A97146FD01D0A64682A97CC1B8FE0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Although the claim made was 100% true. this may be engagement bait due to the previous tweets of this Individual to stir up "fact checkers" in the comments and profit. The user also has a history of deleting tweets with notes on them Its Susan Wojcicki not Susan Wolecki https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Wojcicki https://twitter.com/cnviolations/status/1732774285511393697?t=G-tgxiEECWzljM2npnX0ag&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1759120533319209118
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D9E059D57950D3F2212D8748B3BFD5B5EC8A97146FD01D0A64682A97CC1B8FE0
  • createdAtMillis - 1708246184525
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1759120533319209118D9E059D57950D3F2212D8748B3BFD5B5EC8A97146FD01D0A64682A97CC1B8FE0