Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-18 18:09:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 08B5CE0C91F626782972E954A520839FA00F55FCB4B3B48EE31D3C134088B521
Participant Details

Original Note:

Although the claim made was 100% true. this may be engagement bait due to the previous tweets of this Individual to stir up "fact checkers" in the comments and profit. The user also has a history of deleting tweets with notes on them Its Susan Wojcicki not Susan Wolecki https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Wojcicki https://twitter.com/cnviolations/status/1732774285511393697?t=G-tgxiEECWzljM2npnX0ag&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1759120533319209118
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 08B5CE0C91F626782972E954A520839FA00F55FCB4B3B48EE31D3C134088B521
  • createdAtMillis - 1708279742553
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 175912053331920911808B5CE0C91F626782972E954A520839FA00F55FCB4B3B48EE31D3C134088B521