Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-18 13:10:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D385AD648CBC13A0AB0AB5A555DD6166F58E305E5F5ADCD6FB10B34CF4C15726
Participant Details

Original Note:

The judge set the value based on the tax appraisal value, instead of fair market value, choosing to vastly undervalue the property. The judge had discretion to pick how to value the property, he chose the valuation method that would result in the lowest possible value. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1759035620184428844
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D385AD648CBC13A0AB0AB5A555DD6166F58E305E5F5ADCD6FB10B34CF4C15726
  • createdAtMillis - 1708261820857
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1759035620184428844D385AD648CBC13A0AB0AB5A555DD6166F58E305E5F5ADCD6FB10B34CF4C15726