Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-18 10:38:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BEACA2C29310F91AC724B62CC43BCECAF4244E12CD0C9B5B2589373CAF4115E4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The judge set the value based on the tax appraisal value, instead of fair market value, choosing to vastly undervalue the property. The judge had discretion to pick how to value the property, he chose the valuation method that would result in the lowest possible value. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1759035620184428844
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BEACA2C29310F91AC724B62CC43BCECAF4244E12CD0C9B5B2589373CAF4115E4
  • createdAtMillis - 1708252694995
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1759035620184428844BEACA2C29310F91AC724B62CC43BCECAF4244E12CD0C9B5B2589373CAF4115E4