Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-18 08:23:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 125492C7D09B91F158057A617A6375897F52367B8D6B1C62B976A2E93F58B70E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The judge set the value based on the tax appraisal value, instead of fair market value, choosing to vastly undervalue the property. The judge had discretion to pick how to value the property, he chose the valuation method that would result in the lowest possible value. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1759035620184428844
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 125492C7D09B91F158057A617A6375897F52367B8D6B1C62B976A2E93F58B70E
  • createdAtMillis - 1708244623803
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1759035620184428844125492C7D09B91F158057A617A6375897F52367B8D6B1C62B976A2E93F58B70E