Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-18 18:37:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A54892FAE595FDF4E981715114B16B8ECC16FD6C7A0C0DF7DDD23BA5A6820FC7
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. It's not clear to me how this could be interpreted as a rigid expression of fact, how one could disprove the 'claim,' or why the comments section isn't the right place for this discussion. At the bare minimum, it is not misleading.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1758999121204044055
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A54892FAE595FDF4E981715114B16B8ECC16FD6C7A0C0DF7DDD23BA5A6820FC7
  • createdAtMillis - 1708281438005
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1758999121204044055A54892FAE595FDF4E981715114B16B8ECC16FD6C7A0C0DF7DDD23BA5A6820FC7