Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-18 21:29:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B051D41350DD74DB36F99AB3CDC4BF648181FCBF6B64E8C8B9A0DB7068AA67CA
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post itself is in poor taste. Not sure the point of it, but the proposed CNs don’t address the insanity of the note itself and would make CN seem both inadequate and randomly obvious if posted. Proposed CNs aren’t an answer. Maybe best to leave post as is.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1758996998223540535
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B051D41350DD74DB36F99AB3CDC4BF648181FCBF6B64E8C8B9A0DB7068AA67CA
  • createdAtMillis - 1708291782711
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1758996998223540535B051D41350DD74DB36F99AB3CDC4BF648181FCBF6B64E8C8B9A0DB7068AA67CA