Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-18 00:35:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5A4A86CC9D222F95290E18B8ECD60EA6582BEA9D17AAD4CD213723ACED108F68
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post itself is in poor taste. Not sure the point of it, but the proposed CNs don’t address the insanity of the note itself and would make CN seem both inadequate and randomly obvious if posted. Proposed CNs aren’t an answer. Maybe best to leave post as is.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1758996998223540535
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5A4A86CC9D222F95290E18B8ECD60EA6582BEA9D17AAD4CD213723ACED108F68
  • createdAtMillis - 1708216543569
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17589969982235405355A4A86CC9D222F95290E18B8ECD60EA6582BEA9D17AAD4CD213723ACED108F68