Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-18 00:19:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4420D764BD4E571623CA138B433CAC7B319FED5FE8ED1DA2BF844D7E9EB8F985
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post itself is in poor taste. Not sure the point of it, but the proposed CNs don’t address the insanity of the note itself and would make CN seem both inadequate and randomly obvious if posted. Proposed CNs aren’t an answer. Maybe best to leave post as is.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1758996998223540535
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4420D764BD4E571623CA138B433CAC7B319FED5FE8ED1DA2BF844D7E9EB8F985
  • createdAtMillis - 1708215557613
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17589969982235405354420D764BD4E571623CA138B433CAC7B319FED5FE8ED1DA2BF844D7E9EB8F985