Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-17 21:25:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CD0C34C5DE091E6D7B6D5AE5708660D014298A138824A5D89AE4A759E79E3CAF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Cerfia omet d'utiliser le conditionnel à propos de la représentation du danger de l'individu en se reposant uniquement sur les dires d'un particulier (@BoudiNabil). Le tweet à but informatif peut mener à de la désinformation pure et dure. https://www.larousse.fr/dictionnaires/francais/conditionnel/18017

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1758955497070174563
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CD0C34C5DE091E6D7B6D5AE5708660D014298A138824A5D89AE4A759E79E3CAF
  • createdAtMillis - 1708205158894
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1758955497070174563CD0C34C5DE091E6D7B6D5AE5708660D014298A138824A5D89AE4A759E79E3CAF