Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-17 20:04:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1611801EE6B572822949412807FCCDF89B8E86439830F152536D716F222B1DA0
Participant Details

Original Note:

This image is fake and digitally altered https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N3590Z4/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1758911728530674165
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1611801EE6B572822949412807FCCDF89B8E86439830F152536D716F222B1DA0
  • createdAtMillis - 1708200270902
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17589117285306741651611801EE6B572822949412807FCCDF89B8E86439830F152536D716F222B1DA0