Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-17 14:04:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BE2C03929882E8CF76FFCFF69241D3458CF5117E567E02B728F78E695248DDBE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Rating notes as not helpful, despite the evidence being presented along with the actual context, simply because of your political perspective, SHOULD lead to immediate suspension of access. It's cancel culture, in CN. Shame on you! https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13278-023-01122-8

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1758850170953851219
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BE2C03929882E8CF76FFCFF69241D3458CF5117E567E02B728F78E695248DDBE
  • createdAtMillis - 1708178692084
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1758850170953851219BE2C03929882E8CF76FFCFF69241D3458CF5117E567E02B728F78E695248DDBE