Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-17 20:06:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 93F1C5B4DFFAE9A51E70DA5D5C73B7CAC68B4354F0A82E6FEFC619060B1C3DF4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ankieta przeprowadzona wśród odbiorców jednego profilu na Twitterze nie jest badaniem na reprezentatywnej próbie, niezależnie od wielkości tej próby. http://nastrazysondazy.uw.edu.pl/metodologia-badan/metodologia/reprezentatywnosc-proby/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1758846442557387030
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 93F1C5B4DFFAE9A51E70DA5D5C73B7CAC68B4354F0A82E6FEFC619060B1C3DF4
  • createdAtMillis - 1708200388558
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175884644255738703093F1C5B4DFFAE9A51E70DA5D5C73B7CAC68B4354F0A82E6FEFC619060B1C3DF4