Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-17 20:51:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 28E2E0E45AB91382A8EBCCF2F1A5501E84CE292088A62099DD896E5D4DBF1F8F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ankieta przeprowadzona wśród odbiorców jednego profilu na Twitterze nie jest badaniem na reprezentatywnej próbie, niezależnie od wielkości tej próby. http://nastrazysondazy.uw.edu.pl/metodologia-badan/metodologia/reprezentatywnosc-proby/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1758846442557387030
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 28E2E0E45AB91382A8EBCCF2F1A5501E84CE292088A62099DD896E5D4DBF1F8F
  • createdAtMillis - 1708203090880
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175884644255738703028E2E0E45AB91382A8EBCCF2F1A5501E84CE292088A62099DD896E5D4DBF1F8F