Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-17 17:16:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B3189AC6E28C78E80514446F61F4EC0F652C93272B1F4188C04970C7795479F7
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Current note stating “only” 9% of buildings destroyed. Link reveals 9% destroyed but 30% at least moderately damaged. In any case, these numbers do not refute the tweet. Also the note misquotes the date - the report is from Feb but satellite imagery is from early Jan. https://t.co/O2UZSXK1JV

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1758842594631508473
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B3189AC6E28C78E80514446F61F4EC0F652C93272B1F4188C04970C7795479F7
  • createdAtMillis - 1708190161345
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1758842594631508473B3189AC6E28C78E80514446F61F4EC0F652C93272B1F4188C04970C7795479F7