Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-02 13:10:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9F1FF7B4D8DED6A3B94119B09E02C9A6164EC73B9B53A7B0F228DFE751C8D6C4
Participant Details

Original Note:

警察は「相当処分」との意見を付していますが、引用元の記事では省かれている事に留意が必要です。 https://www.sankei.com/article/20240216-KZ7YOH3WYFLZRHZA235AXGLESY/ なお、「相当処分」とは、警察としては捜査の結果「必ずしも公判請求(起訴)を求めておらず、検察に判断を任せる。」との意見になります。 https://www.authense.jp/keiji/column/333/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1758732703468560441
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9F1FF7B4D8DED6A3B94119B09E02C9A6164EC73B9B53A7B0F228DFE751C8D6C4
  • createdAtMillis - 1717333850796
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17587327034685604419F1FF7B4D8DED6A3B94119B09E02C9A6164EC73B9B53A7B0F228DFE751C8D6C4