Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-17 02:24:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 57CEBB27664B210590C2CF0336AAAA7264D4F1DB8093F0413EC12743CB0E10BF
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The group expressing issues with the article stated they requested a retraction, and an investigation found that the issues raised were matters of differing interpretation rather than falsehoods or errors. The article has not been retracted. https://twitter.com/VetcovExpo/status/1643238820089929728?s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1758629407046914201
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 57CEBB27664B210590C2CF0336AAAA7264D4F1DB8093F0413EC12743CB0E10BF
  • createdAtMillis - 1708136683413
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175862940704691420157CEBB27664B210590C2CF0336AAAA7264D4F1DB8093F0413EC12743CB0E10BF