Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-19 07:56:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2E137D21F542EAE0983F6A568F72F166868D9FFCF1EE63DBD591A3D0B1E68CE1
Participant Details

Original Note:

regardless of the inaccuracies of the book, the tweet itself doesn't seem to offer misleading information. is important to understand that the scope of CN as a tool is pretty narrow. it's not supposed to guide conversation.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1758576181551501323
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2E137D21F542EAE0983F6A568F72F166868D9FFCF1EE63DBD591A3D0B1E68CE1
  • createdAtMillis - 1708329371658
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17585761815515013232E137D21F542EAE0983F6A568F72F166868D9FFCF1EE63DBD591A3D0B1E68CE1