Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-19 08:43:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1250C5BAB66F3670AC511EC8A89797B843C852EB40A655BD52CF48177019F8DA
Participant Details

Original Note:

regardless of the inaccuracies of the book, the tweet itself doesn't seem to offer misleading information. is important to understand that the scope of CN as a tool is pretty narrow. it's not supposed to guide conversation.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1758576181551501323
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1250C5BAB66F3670AC511EC8A89797B843C852EB40A655BD52CF48177019F8DA
  • createdAtMillis - 1708332237292
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17585761815515013231250C5BAB66F3670AC511EC8A89797B843C852EB40A655BD52CF48177019F8DA