Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-16 23:44:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 006D822C8AEE7FD3AC91027A5A8F69326900340E15297F3062B510129DD39729
Participant Details

Original Note:

regardless of the inaccuracies of the book, the tweet itself doesn't seem to offer misleading information. is important to understand that the scope of CN as a tool is pretty narrow. it's not supposed to guide conversation.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1758576181551501323
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 006D822C8AEE7FD3AC91027A5A8F69326900340E15297F3062B510129DD39729
  • createdAtMillis - 1708127068966
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1758576181551501323006D822C8AEE7FD3AC91027A5A8F69326900340E15297F3062B510129DD39729