Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-17 03:34:35 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CEB6968C3815EA7E8CCFFB7F50F28924ECCF825782D0B30FC6EE31FB3AB19ECC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claim that the hashtag #BoycottJohnLewis has been trending on X is false because it has not. James has confused 'For You' with 'Trending'. It will of course appear to be trending for him because this is his current focus which 'For You' will reflect. https://help.twitter.com/en/resources/recommender-systems/explore-recommendations

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1758533312723739094
participantId -
raterParticipantId - CEB6968C3815EA7E8CCFFB7F50F28924ECCF825782D0B30FC6EE31FB3AB19ECC
createdAtMillis - 1708140875995
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1758533312723739094CEB6968C3815EA7E8CCFFB7F50F28924ECCF825782D0B30FC6EE31FB3AB19ECC