Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-16 09:53:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B7EF49D15B62DB2756C3ACC188FD38FD7395F6C8C43EC440CF8269F2121A9A24
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note says “post misrepresents OpenAI as using the author’s work without credit” but the post neither says nor implies that OpenAI failed to credit their work, only that they used it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1758329433663111441
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B7EF49D15B62DB2756C3ACC188FD38FD7395F6C8C43EC440CF8269F2121A9A24
  • createdAtMillis - 1708077234191
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1758329433663111441B7EF49D15B62DB2756C3ACC188FD38FD7395F6C8C43EC440CF8269F2121A9A24