Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-15 20:52:34 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7E0A563C23ED0A8E9950582AA16780A3C555B1DAAD4056AFABF823D32D7C46E4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die auf in der CN verwiesene Studie präsentiert ein neues Modell, nicht eine tatsächlich messbare Annährung an einen Kipppunkt. Die CN ist daher irreführend.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1758232645576569063
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7E0A563C23ED0A8E9950582AA16780A3C555B1DAAD4056AFABF823D32D7C46E4
  • createdAtMillis - 1708030354395
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17582326455765690637E0A563C23ED0A8E9950582AA16780A3C555B1DAAD4056AFABF823D32D7C46E4