Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-15 21:31:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 87843A3EBA5E9B53EA12BBAF0AF887B2407FE26684B137EA05E6457B330BE945
Participant Details

Original Note:

La nota è corretta perché fa notare che l'affermazione della ministra rientra nella situazione di "Si tratta di una rappresentazione fuorviante o che trascura un contesto fondamentale" e la nota serve proprio ad aggiungere il contesto, dicendo che la ministra può agire https://it.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniela_Santanch%C3%A8

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1758166446322983215
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 87843A3EBA5E9B53EA12BBAF0AF887B2407FE26684B137EA05E6457B330BE945
  • createdAtMillis - 1708032701959
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 175816644632298321587843A3EBA5E9B53EA12BBAF0AF887B2407FE26684B137EA05E6457B330BE945