Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-16 09:09:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 63E2BFD65629A8BE71DBFC721B19B231599142023F4C3CEFD7D72DA73E12A5DD
Participant Details

Original Note:

La nota è corretta perché fa notare che l'affermazione della ministra rientra nella situazione di "Si tratta di una rappresentazione fuorviante o che trascura un contesto fondamentale" e la nota serve proprio ad aggiungere il contesto, dicendo che la ministra può agire https://it.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniela_Santanch%C3%A8

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1758166446322983215
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 63E2BFD65629A8BE71DBFC721B19B231599142023F4C3CEFD7D72DA73E12A5DD
  • createdAtMillis - 1708074595503
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175816644632298321563E2BFD65629A8BE71DBFC721B19B231599142023F4C3CEFD7D72DA73E12A5DD