Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-14 20:41:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9CC7A4FB9C30D5D6BEE2B93E5B7E2A0C595FB6324971516AAB363C601F570B72
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note misses the point that Sams is making. His post makes it clear that he is arguing that the full text of the SC report does not support the media's coverage of the report. The note does not provide needed context because the letter already addresses the summary.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1757861812593164390
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9CC7A4FB9C30D5D6BEE2B93E5B7E2A0C595FB6324971516AAB363C601F570B72
  • createdAtMillis - 1707943292044
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17578618125931643909CC7A4FB9C30D5D6BEE2B93E5B7E2A0C595FB6324971516AAB363C601F570B72