Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-14 20:27:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4E69487DC5EF3758EF3F1E65C5BFCA3470B42E2A991727FA9E035EFCE99CCF94
Participant Details

Original Note:

This post is misleading. The council was seeking information and thought the property was empty. There was no threat to repossess the house. The Daily Mail article shows the letter and it is clear that this version of events is wrong. https://t.co/yebu5Y5gLw

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1757861036529434853
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4E69487DC5EF3758EF3F1E65C5BFCA3470B42E2A991727FA9E035EFCE99CCF94
  • createdAtMillis - 1707942430789
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17578610365294348534E69487DC5EF3758EF3F1E65C5BFCA3470B42E2A991727FA9E035EFCE99CCF94