Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-14 21:32:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CC50A83680960625CD262630FFFD18CD16C53791D9CF7320F9CFC5AEA39C343F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN because it is factually correct. The note above indicating that a Reuter's article says the teen doesn't have to pay the fine is NOT contained in the article. Therefore, that note is factually misleading and therefore without proof, there is no note needed nor does it help https://t.co/qRRCj71LAM

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1757852947206095100
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CC50A83680960625CD262630FFFD18CD16C53791D9CF7320F9CFC5AEA39C343F
  • createdAtMillis - 1707946324514
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1757852947206095100CC50A83680960625CD262630FFFD18CD16C53791D9CF7320F9CFC5AEA39C343F