Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-14 20:14:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C6B594878171C56A6A629429AC1F4C0AD84DC04DBF196A886AB7C1EB7B439117
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN because it is factually correct. The note above indicating that a Reuter's article says the teen doesn't have to pay the fine is NOT contained in the article. Therefore, that note is factually misleading and therefore without proof, there is no note needed nor does it help https://t.co/qRRCj71LAM

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1757852947206095100
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C6B594878171C56A6A629429AC1F4C0AD84DC04DBF196A886AB7C1EB7B439117
  • createdAtMillis - 1707941665216
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1757852947206095100C6B594878171C56A6A629429AC1F4C0AD84DC04DBF196A886AB7C1EB7B439117