Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-14 20:38:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B4AA2212A0A001FA1EB6B2B8551FE056196C28A02134C5DD525A24D32835C0EC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN because it is factually correct. The note above indicating that a Reuter's article says the teen doesn't have to pay the fine is NOT contained in the article. Therefore, that note is factually misleading and therefore without proof, there is no note needed nor does it help https://t.co/qRRCj71LAM

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1757852947206095100
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B4AA2212A0A001FA1EB6B2B8551FE056196C28A02134C5DD525A24D32835C0EC
  • createdAtMillis - 1707943097029
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1757852947206095100B4AA2212A0A001FA1EB6B2B8551FE056196C28A02134C5DD525A24D32835C0EC